Comments on: The Diving Bell and the Butterfly http://www.godwriting.org/godwriting/the-movie-about-the-french-editor-of-elle-the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly.htm Listening to The Voice Within Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:09:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: One http://www.godwriting.org/godwriting/the-movie-about-the-french-editor-of-elle-the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly.htm#comment-85950 One Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:02:03 +0000 http://www.godwriting.org/godwriting/the-movie-about-the-french-editor-of-elle-the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly.htm#comment-85950 Often "why" is a secondary detail. It is enough for me that I am inspired by the story. Often “why” is a secondary detail. It is enough for me that I am inspired by the story.

]]> By: Gloria http://www.godwriting.org/godwriting/the-movie-about-the-french-editor-of-elle-the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly.htm#comment-85706 Gloria Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:06:03 +0000 http://www.godwriting.org/godwriting/the-movie-about-the-french-editor-of-elle-the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly.htm#comment-85706 This is the original title of the book. In French, it is Le scaphandre et le papillon. This is the original title of the book. In French, it is Le scaphandre et le papillon.

]]> By: Normand Bourque http://www.godwriting.org/godwriting/the-movie-about-the-french-editor-of-elle-the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly.htm#comment-85672 Normand Bourque Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:49:34 +0000 http://www.godwriting.org/godwriting/the-movie-about-the-french-editor-of-elle-the-diving-bell-and-the-butterfly.htm#comment-85672 Beloved Gloria First of all, I am intrigued about the title: «The Diving Bell and the Butterfly». Is it the title of the book? If yes then it should give us a clue. If the title is from the director of the movie, this could mean something else. My comment(s) will be twofold: (1) the old energy interpretation and (2) the new energy interpretation. . (1) The old energy interpretation: Evolution, punishment and warning (and the accompanying guilt and regret and auto-condamnation) are typical of the karmic approach to human life. There is a Universal Justice system that states that everyone must do God's will. For non-believers, it might just be "you just got what you deserve!» in a clerical moral judgement system.There is no real room for «experimenting» on earth. Of course, denying experience (even experimentation) is typical of dualism since good must overcome evil and evil has been to be admitted and condemned. What strikes me in the theme of the film and in a broader perspective is that the basic cause of all evil remains SEX, no matter if it explicitely said or not. If mankind did not have sex, it woud not have emotions or/and vice versa. We never got really out of the Adam and Eve guilt pattern. We could go on and on at length on the deep lack of integration of sexuality in our societies and even in our spiritual quest. Sex remains an unsolved mystery. But we use it to build all our judgements! (2) The new energy interpretation: Although 99.99999% of spiritual channelers never even mention the word sex, we assume that the new energy interpretation overtake the basic trio of evolution, warning and punishment. Before we incarnate we choose the kind of experience we want to make of this incarnation. It is not a strictly predestinated experience but an actual choice among potentialities. If you want to no longer experience poverty in this particular life, you will probably be born in conditions where you will be poor one day or the other. In the book I have not read and the film I have not seen) Jean-Dominique wrote “How I hurt this woman. And now I have no way to make it up to her.” Sexuality, emotions and social values are the components of the series of potentialities. But what was Jean-Dominique's choice of experience in is pre-incarnation he seems to have made? Was the accident a way to experience guilteness and reparation through the process or revovery from coma and paralysis by succeeding in doing the impossible, writing about it while being so impaired only to say to her that he nad no way to make it up to her'. This bring a team of the new energy interpretation: can we let go the past and overcome the sense of Guilt and move forward.? IN both interpretation, sex and emotion are only background factors while, to my opinion, they should be put in a more first plan perspective. Sex is the vehicle of incarnation and is at the heart of power and politics and social behaviors. If the God of the old energy used the fifth commandment to express his point of view on sexuality (and all the traditions and practices that sprouted from that commandment), the God of new energy (through the new channelers) does not give any guideline on sexuality and seems to be rather mute on that subject. Beloved Gloria
First of all, I am intrigued about the title: «The Diving Bell and the Butterfly». Is it the title of the book? If yes then it should give us a clue. If the title is from the director of the movie, this could mean something else.

My comment(s) will be twofold: (1) the old energy interpretation and (2) the new energy interpretation. .

(1) The old energy interpretation: Evolution, punishment and warning (and the accompanying guilt and regret and auto-condamnation) are typical of the karmic approach to human life. There is a Universal Justice system that states that everyone must do God’s will. For non-believers, it might just be “you just got what you deserve!» in a clerical moral judgement system.There is no real room for «experimenting» on earth. Of course, denying experience (even experimentation) is typical of dualism since good must overcome evil and evil has been to be admitted and condemned.

What strikes me in the theme of the film and in a broader perspective is that the basic cause of all evil remains SEX, no matter if it explicitely said or not. If mankind did not have sex, it woud not have emotions or/and vice versa. We never got really out of the Adam and Eve guilt pattern. We could go on and on at length on the deep lack of integration of sexuality in our societies and even in our spiritual quest. Sex remains an unsolved mystery. But we use it to build all our judgements!

(2) The new energy interpretation: Although 99.99999% of spiritual channelers never even mention the word sex, we assume that the new energy interpretation overtake the basic trio of evolution, warning and punishment. Before we incarnate we choose the kind of experience we want to make of this incarnation. It is not a strictly predestinated experience but an actual choice among potentialities. If you want to no longer experience poverty in this particular life, you will probably be born in conditions where you will be poor one day or the other. In the book I have not read and the film I have not seen) Jean-Dominique wrote “How I hurt this woman. And now I have no way to make it up to her.” Sexuality, emotions and social values are the components of the series of potentialities. But what was Jean-Dominique’s choice of experience in is pre-incarnation he seems to have made? Was the accident a way to experience guilteness and reparation through the process or revovery from coma and paralysis by succeeding in doing the impossible, writing about it while being so impaired only to say to her that he nad no way to make it up to her’. This bring a team of the new energy interpretation: can we let go the past and overcome the sense of Guilt and move forward.?

IN both interpretation, sex and emotion are only background factors while, to my opinion, they should be put in a more first plan perspective. Sex is the vehicle of incarnation and is at the heart of power and politics and social behaviors. If the God of the old energy used the fifth commandment to express his point of view on sexuality (and all the traditions and practices that sprouted from that commandment), the God of new energy (through the new channelers) does not give any guideline on sexuality and seems to be rather mute on that subject.

]]>