Heroes and Value Clarification

Last night Heaven Admin rented a movie called Flash of Genius.

The movie opens with the main character, Bob Kearns, a college professor, played superbly by Greg Kinnear, telling his engineering class that there is much more to engineering than the engineering itself. There is the importance of ethics. He gave as an example the service to mankind in the engineering of a pacemaker and the disservice to mankind in the engineering of the gas chambers.

The whole movie is about truth and honesty and fair dealing. It is about value clarification. This man invented the intermittent windshield wiper. Major Detroit car manufacturers had tried and tried to perfect this mechanism without success. The major car manufacturer that Bob Kearns went to with his invention had no intention of being honest with the inventor. They didn’t care if they tricked him and stole his invention. And that’s what they did and did deliberately.

There were no gray areas here. The car manufacturer’s dishonesty was black and white.  And they had no shame. That is what amazes me. I can understand the tendency for greed and deception. What I can’t understand is the company’s not having any sense of embarrassment about it, not caring at all if they are dishonest, not caring how their dishonesty may impact another human being’s life. I don’t know how they justified it or lived with themselves.

Now, I would think that all of the inventor’s friends and family and associates would come to his aid. Not at all.

After Bob Kearns had pestered the car manufacturer, they had a flunky offer him $250,000 for the rights.  Bob asked: “And will they admit that I am the inventor?”

The answer was no.

Bob Kearns said: “This is not about money. This is about honor.” And he refused the money.

His friends and family thought he should accept the $250,000. They were unable to rally around him. “You can’t fight a major car manufacturer in Detroit.”

I used to do a whole lot of value clarification with my classes, and I surely would use this movie with them. Here are some of the questions that I would ask my students, have asked myself, and I will also ask you and why you have the answer you do:

Would you have accepted the $250,000 without the acknowledgment that the invention was yours?

Would you have accepted $30 million dollars without the acknowledgement?

If you were Bob’s wife, would you have left him because you couldn’t live with his obsession of making this right in the face of insurmountable obstacles?

If you were his children, would you have been disappointed in your father for not letting anything stop him?

If you were Bill Kearns, would you have turned down everyone’s advice to quit, including psychiatrists’ advice?

If you were Bob Kearns, would you have continued your full-time fight for twelve years?

If you were Bob Kearns’ family and friends, would you say Bill had been right to do as he did only if he won?  Is that what your opinion would be based on — the results?

I am not able to answer all of these questions the way I wish I could. Of course, how do we really know until we’re faced with the reality?

What I can say is that there are all kinds of heroes, and I am a fan of Bob Kearns who would not give up.

Posted by Gloria on December 13th, 2009 under these topics
Movies, Personal Development, Godwriting Journal

Post Discussion

8 Replies

Reply from Jack van Raders on December 13, 2009

No I forget about it I would not accept their money and sleep at night If the greed does keep them awake fine if not also fine. Someone ordered $4000.- worth of fruit we got $500.- and a lot of excuses which we heard al before. So let it be I hope he does well we will not sell any more to them and others now have to pay up front. Why fight for 12 years. Like this year some one ordered a lot for $7.500 When it was ready He could not pay it is still in the freezer. so money wise we are short but sleepwise very good. We are happy and nothing worries us.let others worry about their lifes and let no one influence your Happyness.

Reply from Jochen on December 14, 2009

I would be beside myself with rage, for quite some time I wouldn’t be able tho think of anything but how to wage war on them, this kind of blind selfishness being the worst thing there is. But Jack is so right. And God must be right when He calls all those people innocent, when He tells me I’m only raging against myself. Fighting is not the solution, and for some this seems to be the hardest lesson of all. It is for me.

Reply from paula on December 14, 2009

I don’t know whether there are ‘right’ answers to these questions. Certainly, if I were his child, I would have been proud of him. But if I were him, maybe I would have accepted the money, or maybe I would not have asked for anything at all. What does it matter who invented the thing? After all, every invention comes from God in the end. My fulfilment would be in being able to improve people’s lives. And maybe I would have accepted the money, so I could make other inventions, have further insights from God, to improve people’s lives even further.

Reply from Gloria on December 14, 2009

Yes, beloved Paula, there aren’t right answers to these questions. There are your answers, and Jochen’s and Jack’s, and mine. That’s what value clarification is about. Why we chose the answers we choose tells us something about ourselves.

After reading all your answers, I am looking at this in ways I did not before. I love all your responses. What Jack says is absolutely right. What Jochen says is absolutely right. What you, Paula, say is absolutely right. And Bob Kearns was absolutely right for Bob Kearns.

Bob Kearns was not the only one. Many other inventors had had their inventions swiped by big business. Were they right to just swallow it? Did they feel good about themselves?

I really think Bob Kearns was a simple good man who saw things clearly the way he saw them. I don’t think he fought this just for himself. He was simply incapable of sweeping this under the table. Someone had to fight for the little man. And he did. And he fought through legal means.

Reply from Lynda on December 14, 2009

I am just reading this now.

If this were a few years ago, I would have done the same thing. It is about integrity.
But it should not also be about fighting for 12 years. That is 12 years he could’ve been doing something positive.

He and God know who invented the intermittment wiper (and now so do I :) Like paula, I would have been so proud of him if I were his child. I would not have let him, if I were his wife. But if I were him, I would have taken the money, and doen something else very speacial with it.

Reply from Jack van Raders on December 15, 2009

Money Is dirt but it seems to be very good dirt everthing seems to grow on it. Love you all Jack

Reply from Joyce on December 15, 2009

I see that you are investigating moral issues here, and my comment is not relevant to that. But I just want to share something I have learned about patents. My father had numerous patents but never made any money from them. He didn’t understand how patents work. He thought you could patent an idea, but you can’t. You can only patent a design. Basically a patent protects a manufacturer from having someone do exactly what they are doing. So if have a great idea, you have to become a manufacturer or you won’t make any money off it. That’s because someone can make a slight change to your design, and then they are no longer violating your patent. I suspect that’s what happenned with Bob Kearns.

Reply from Gloria on December 15, 2009

Your dad was an inventor!

According to the movie, the car manufacturer clearly intended to steal the design and did, in fact, steal the design. The company executive intentionally lied and intentionally stole the design. If it had been a question of the company’s making a change to the design, how would the court have fined the company ten million dollars and then later another company (who had also profited from the design but had done no malfeasance that I know of) 30 million or so?

The crooked car manufacturer’s name was used in the movie. The attorneys for the movie would never have permitted anything that could have brought a suit from the named car manufacturer. In matters of the suit, what was portrayed had to be 100% accurate.

What the car manufacturer did was unethical, dishonest, and downright illegal. I am embarrassed for them.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment