Brown eyes and blue eyes

It is amazing to me what a careless reader I am sometimes. I glance and think I have read.

A commenter the other day was saying what the poem was by Langston Hughes that Jonathan Kozel got fired over, and I took umbrage to the poem, not to the poem itself but to the poem as a selection for children. Of course, I would never ever have fired Jonathan Kozel.

And then to my dismay, I learn that Jonathan Kozel didn’t see the point of memorizing poetry! It just goes to show that no one is perfect straight across the board. If there is one thing I would espouse in education today, it would be memorizing poetry worth memorizing. Then the children have the essence of the poem in their cells forever.

But what I was going to write about was what Jonathan Kozel said about how many male black children drop out of major city schools — to the tune of 50%.

Why would anyone want to stay in a school that does not serve them? Why would anyone want to stay anywhere where they are not being valued?  Being in school may have been humiliating for them from the first day. School is not always the best place to be in. I would say that sometimes it can be the worst imaginable place to be.

I remember a study done where a class was divided according to eye color. Blue eyes were in, and brown eyes were out. Blue eyes were valued, and brown eyed-children were not. What happened to these innocent children was deplorable. Even the nicest children became condemning.

And then the roles were reversed. You wanted to be brown-eyed, and blue eyes were frowned on. And now the brown-eyed were favored. They were honored. And they did very well (except for their superior attitude.) It was a travesty what happened to the children in that study. It was so bad that the study had to be stopped.

One of the points of this study was to show how powerful were preconceived ideas, the children’s and the teacher’s.

I wonder what would happen if teachers expected the black boys in kindergarten to be the brightest most creative fast-learners of all.  I know what I think would happen.

Jonathan Kozel has reverence for compulsory education. He honors a country that desires to have education for all. And I love that too.

At the same time, I think that if children were not made to go to school, children would have a better feeling about going to school. Attitudes would change. It seems to me somehow that in public education, the cart is put before the horse.

It’s not so easy to value something that is forced on you.

In line with this, there seems to be a rampant sense of schools owing children an education and the children being some kind of receivers of education.

When I taught school, I am proud of myself that I told the children not to wait for anyone to give them an education. Not the schools, not any teacher. Education was something they had to get for themselves. No one was going to give it to them.

Tomorrow I will tell you about the moving sale my daughter and I had today. And then there’s something else I still want to say about schools.

Posted by Gloria on September 12th, 2009 under these topics
poetry, Education, Godwriting Journal

Post Discussion

12 Replies

Reply from Jack van Raders on September 12, 2009

Ihated school from day ONE. Till I was finaly ready for nautical college and I did a 3 year course in under 18 month. The reason I did not like school was because the teachers put themselves on a pedestal and could never be wrong and you were only a student and a dumb student at that. I shifted school because the headmaster threatened me to throw me through every corner of his room if the door was locked. He was not so sure of himself when I invited him to please lock the door. the headmaster in the other school was a gentleman and sorry for him he had to cope with a staff that was superior to every student. Now because of the callibre of the teachers I have never been interested in poetry, or it might be just me as poetry does not speak to me. I like God a lot better to raed!!!! love you all Jack

Reply from Jochen on September 13, 2009

School, to me, is just one of the areas where the general climate of compulsion and coercion is more visible than in other places. In a culture where no one really believes that we are children of God and everything is given to us, it’s only natural that we believe wresting and wrenching is the way to do it, and that we try to force and manipulate each other into compliance with what we want or consider necessary. I think it’s not even worth discussing because whatever we attempted in the past or will attempt in the future to reform education, none of it has ever or will ever reach the core of fear from which the need to force comes – not only in school. The only solution is to verify in our own heart what God says. Everything else ist continuing and refining the forcing game that has been going on for as long as there are humans.

Jack, I had intensely poetic teachers and still I don’t (generally) like poetry. It’s in ourselves, not from our environment. You are speaking straight from my heart: I like God a lot better to read.

Reply from Gloria on September 13, 2009

Beloved Jochen, you are so right. Real change has to come from consciousness.

Beloved Jack, it is hard to imagine that your teachers and headmasters didn’t know who you were. I’m so glad you stuck to your own integrity. Also, you turned out great!

Both of you, I kinda consider Heavenletters poetry!

Reply from emilia on September 13, 2009

I would not reform, but abolish all systems, the health system, the retirement system as well as the educational system. They are fashioned on the masses perceived needs. They come from the believing that the human being needs guidance, assistence and rules to follow. I only believe in freedom and in the power of individuality. I would also abolish the word “society” which is a jail for me. And “systems” are the chains of this prison. I dream of a world fashioned on individual talents, not on mass needs. Just a dream, but worth dreaming!

Reply from Chuck Gebhardt on September 13, 2009

I agree with just about everything everyone is saying here, but I have a little bit of a different slant on some of the points made.

What we are addressing here is a society that has evolved out of certain shared assumptions and often unquestioned beliefs. When I say society, I mean all of the variants throughout the developed nations which I view as all following these same basic assumptions. I would describe these basic assumptions as belief in the corrupt nature of man that we are seen as trying to overcome and protect each other from, as well as the limited resources of the world that must be rationed out and competed for.

Obviously, there is a huge gap between these assumptions and the ideas we are reading about and discussing every day in the Heavenletters and on these forums.

What should we do about this? Are we to just focus on our own spiritual advancement and ignore the negative aspects of the institutions like our educational systems that we would like to be more progressive? Certainly, as Jochen so nicely puts it, we are not to try “wrestling and wrenching” nor are we to try to “force and manipulate each other into compliance with what we want or consider necessary.” The question remains, do we try to change or do we ignore?

Now I will speak my prejudices on this question. I think all the readers of Heavenletters are called to them. With this calling comes a sort of quiet and gentle responsibility. Sure we all want to move forward on our spiritual path and these letters facilitate this wonderfully, but we are also called to lead. We should not ignore what we know can be improved, we should engage and be agents for change. Wherever we find ourselves, we can direct our thoughts to the betterment of all of us, and this is worthy and powerful. But as leaders, we should also translate these thoughts into words and actions as part of this call to lead.

So much for my prejudices, my best to all……Chuck

Reply from Gloria on September 13, 2009

My understanding (which counts equally with yours, beloved Chuck)is that God is not asking us to become activists.

Reply from emilia on September 13, 2009

“The question remains, do we try to change or do we ignore?”. We can try both of them, Chuck: to ignore the outside and change the inside, eventually the outside will reflect the inside, “as within so without”.

Reply from Jochen on September 13, 2009

I would never call noble aspirations such as yours a prejudice, dear Chuck. I would always bow deeply to them. And I would also differ. I find everything you say deeply inspiring and enriching, and when I have a different perspective on some things, it never implies opposition. Heavenletters is where we meet, and I trust that all our views are not only compatible but are complementary.

I would say it’s not a question of either “try to change” or “ignore”. Between them is what Heavenletters call “intending”, and my responsibility, as I understand Heavenletters, lies in intending to be love, period. Right action will spontaneously spring from that, I believe, not from a decision made by the mind. “The mind does not love” (HLs #1656 and #1794).

Knowing no better, I have allowed my mind to tell me what to do all my life. It has been bossing me around, promising the earth to me and letting me down every single time. Now I am happy beyond words to hear God say there is nothing I have to DO. Happy because it coincides with what I now recognize to be my own deepest intuition. Oh yes, I would love to see many things changed in this world, but if I can speak of leading at all, it would be leading by being and nothing else. From what I have seen, mind can only have agendas for what it imagines has to be done. And all of that is going to turn into “oddities” tomorrow.

I want my “words and actions” to come from here and nowhere else:

————————————

Perhaps you are in a supermarket, and you look around, and something seems different from what it was a moment ago. Everything is the same except you are not the same. Your vision is changed. There is a dimensionlessness that you see. It is as though you have a glimpse of the fleetingness of time at the same moment you glimpse the glory of Eternity. Time stands still. You see timelessness. It is like you are staring, and you cannot stop staring. Your gaze is simple, and yet it is momentous. Your hand is still on the cart. You are in the supermarket, yet that which was always ordinary has become uncanny because you are aware that you occupy the universe and no place else. Suddenly, all that has been familiar to you all your life is the oddity. Suddenly the Unknown is known, or almost known, and you are at Home with it. You experience the Reality of Eternity, and it is the mundane that has become far-fetched. It is the mundane that is unbelievable.
(From Heaven #2288, “It Can Happen Anywhere”)

Reply from One on September 13, 2009

Going along naked without any preconceived mind frames, in the dynamic now, one is free to be. Undoing is also a doing. In the stillness, the mind frames dissolve and Truth is revealed. I must act to make way for the stillness. Clutter and noise will only hide the beauty. Words may point the way, but they can never say.

Reply from Bonnie on September 13, 2009

Every single thing everyone posted is reiterated in this one Heavenletter!! How absolutely amazing:

http://www.heavenletters.org/ten-stones.html

Fearless Jack sets the headmaster back:

“Abandoning the past means to abandon fear. Fear clings to you for its own sake, not for yours. It is a mistaken thought to believe that you need fear. Fear is not a harbor. It does not protect you. Know you are already secure.”

Everyone was respectful by acknowledging each other’s perception and posing thoughtful questions and listening:

“In order to drop off past thinking, you have to admit to yourself that you do not know everything. You already know you know little, but in many areas you refuse to admit it. Thinking you know more than you do is a cry of your ego.

Accept that you are innocent. What does it mean to be innocent? It means openness. Innocence is not premeditated. And do not equate it with ignorance. Innocence allows the new to dawn. Innocence allows you into the present.”

Our leaning tower of Jochen firmly grounds us in beingness now:

“Lean into the present. The future is not your destination. When you have stepped out of the past, you have already stepped into the present which you had thought of as future. Your future is right now.

Know there is no hurry, for time does not exist. Time is a concept that serves only to box your life. Be caught in timelessness rather than time. Enter the concept of infinity which makes all life all-present right now.”

Emilia knows “They” don’t know:

“Know there is life. Life is life. It is an upward-moving spiral. It is not tests and lessons and corrections. The idea of correction keeps you ever expending your life in the past. Your life has only to grow to the truth of you. You do that by letting the past fall off.

Let your life grow in your acceptance of the truth of you. Accept that you are far more than your present thinking will allow. Your thinking has to catch up to the Reality of you.”

Chuck speaks of our appointment as pioneers-with-a-purpose:

“Now, today, with My blessings, let your thinking grow to new heights so you can begin to imagine what you were born for and what a gift to the universe you are. You will begin to conceive of what God hath wrought. I made you well. Know that so you can scale the heights of Heaven and hold it in your awareness.”

Reply from Gloria on September 13, 2009

“Words may point the way, but they can never say.” That sounds like Godwriting, Senor.

Reply from Pam (fortheloveofGodde) on September 13, 2009

I believe all are saying basically the same thing … leading by BEING, “being the change we want to see in the world.” This is the responsibility I believe Chuck is speaking about–and the way is to simply be as Jochen and others say. To be aware of our own changes within that happen when we accept the responsibility of our calling.

Thank Godde, Gloria, you heeded your call to Godwrite, then to share the Godwriting and the process of Godwriting. How lovely of you to take that responsibility on so that the rest of us can meet here and share in Godde’s words.

I can no longer imagine my days starting without a Heavenletter. Or checking the forum for new comments. Or reading the latest responses to the blog entries. To see what Jack and Jochen and Lauren and Chuck and Berit and 0ne and Emilia and Lynda and everyone else whose name I can’t think of in the moment have to say.

I do believe Godde asks us to be activists, just as he asked of Jesus and Buddha and Mohammed and other master teachers. Just as he asked you to be when you were a teacher. We are to be active participants in our own lives, to be aware and present in the now of our existence.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment